Skip to content

Contents

Everything here, in eight sections. If you are scoping a programme, read the foundations first. If individual measurement is being proposed, read the section on monitoring people before the section on technology.

Foundations

6 notes

Three different things share the name: measuring a process, tracking equipment, and watching people. They need different justifications, and most of the value is in the first two.

Output per person is easy to compute and explains little. The measures that explain performance are about waiting, travel and variation — and all of them are aggregate.

Most facilities already generate more than they use. What each source sees, what it misses, and the data quality defects that produce confident wrong answers.

Attributing measurement to a named person is workplace surveillance with obligations attached, and it costs the cooperation that determines whether any of the data is accurate.

Safety

5 notes

The clearest justification in the field, and the place where monitoring is most often substituted for the physical control that should have been there.

Most of the errors in this field are analytical rather than technical. Reacting to ordinary variation, comparing without normalising, and producing findings nobody acts on.

Ninety days without a purchase, then buying for the gaps you named. Plus the failures that recur, each visible early and each with a specific correction.

Reference

4 notes

Safety, data protection and employment law all apply and pull in different directions. Plus the boundary: questions the data cannot answer, and what to use for each instead.