Monitoring People Is Surveillance
Attributing measurement to named individuals is workplace surveillance, with obligations attached. What to settle before deployment rather than after.
Analysis
8 notes
Attributing measurement to named individuals is workplace surveillance, with obligations attached. What to settle before deployment rather than after.
Analysis
Automated rate targets change how people work, and the changes increase injury risk. The mechanism, and what a defensible standard requires.
Analysis
A requirement in many jurisdictions and the practice that most improves the design. What to consult on, and what to do with the answers.
Procedure
Almost every operational question is answerable without naming anyone. The techniques, and the re-identification traps that undo them.
Procedure
Four cases where attribution is legitimate, the controls each requires, and the drift that turns a justified system into surveillance.
Reference
Monitoring perceived as adversarial degrades the data it collects. The mechanism, and what a deployment looks like that avoids it.
Analysis
Measures that are technically possible, operationally useless and reliably damaging. A short list to rule out at design time.
Reference
Access to one's own measurements is a right in many jurisdictions and, deployed well, converts a surveillance system into a tool people use.
Procedure